I originally wrote this piece about three years ago but since I use it in my management development practice it comes to my attention with some regularity. I really like it, I hope you do as well.
********************************************************************************
A short time ago while leading a workshop I was asked this question by someone who sounded like an experienced manager. “What do I do with an obviously talented report who just doesn’t seem committed to the work he has been assigned?” The manager and I engaged in a brief dialogue to establish the signs that the employee was not committed. What we rapidly determined was probably not surprising. The manager was not necessarily reporting on the results being produced, she was reporting on her observations of the mannerisms of the employee. She didn’t like his attitude! Though not exceptional, the results were fine, but the employee was often overheard discussing matters related to Fantasy Football with colleagues. “If he has this kind of time available why wasn’t he using it for additional production or education on the finer points of the work?” , she quipped. Why indeed?
At first glance this may seem silly example to even talk about. However, I am in and around a lot of managers and supervisors, literally thousands over the period of any given year. It is not uncommon for me to hear similar concerns expressed by many who have management responsibility.
{I’ll be the first one to tell any employee that I believe employee engagement is the responsibility of the employee, when I am talking to employees…and in the blink of an eye I’ll be the first one to tell management that employee engagement is the responsibility of management, when I am talking to management. From my perspective the conversation depends on where you are in the relationship and make no mistake about it, engagement is a matter of relationship. Like any other relationship worth being involved with, there is no simply doing your part; you are either in for the whole thing or not at all.}
As the conversation continued with this particular manager I asked an intentionally provocative question. “Have you ever asked this employee what he finds so engaging about fantasy football?” The manager came back quickly with, “Why should I have to do that?” The point of the question was to establish where the manager stood regarding responsibility for this employee’s level of engagement. The question she asked in response to mine quickly established where she stood. She assumed none.
I went on to ask whether she understood that fantasy football was a fairly complex topic requiring considerable research and attention to detail and nuance. Yes, it was a game that concerned a sport but the skills involved in gaining proficiency called for dedication, study and analysis of statistics, and a commitment to keeping up to date with an ever changing landscape of information. What if she sat down with this employee and explored his interest in depth, strictly for the purpose of understanding what it was about this game that the employee was so passionate about? Might an exploration like this allow her to understand what it was about the game that captured this employee’s interest and warranted such freely given dedication? Perhaps then she might be able to consider structuring the employee’s work to take advantage of his natural interests and get more of the attitude she was looking for as well as more productivity.
She didn’t buy it! And so it goes.
By now you are probably thinking that this encounter I have described is an exception and managers who follow a compliance-based approach to managing productivity and overall performance are fewer and farther between. I beg to differ and I beg you to consider that to the degree you don’t recognize your own or know your manager’s basic attitudes about employee engagement your employee base, your organization’s working capital, is at risk.
Intuitively I have for a number of years suspected that engagement, productivity, retention and profitability are intertwined like the links of the DNA helix. Mainly I came to this belief this by observing myself in relationship to whatever work was required of me. If you find yourself lamenting that your employees don’t appear engaged, you are going to have to do something different. The corollary to these closing words of course is that if you are not willing to do something different, you can reduce your suffering by not expecting anything to change!







Mike-
Thanks for your post. The final paragraph really resonates with me and the work that I do. I’m wondering whether you have read “Firms of Endearment” which came out in 2007 and connects a firm’s sense of higher purpose, employee engagement and concern with all stakeholders (not just shareholders) to significantly higher profits. The follow up book was just released called “Conscious Capitalism,” which outlines how companies can follow this model through the four tenets of higher purpose, conscious leadership, conscious culture, and stakeholder integration. I would highly recommend the book and believe that it would resonate with you from what I have read over the past few months as a blog subscriber.
On another note, I had a meeting with Kathleen Pringle just last week and she spoke highly of Thrive (and loaned me a copy as well). I’ve added it to the top of my list and look forward to reading!
Hope all is well!
Andrew